Entries Tagged 'Completely off topic' ↓

Row, row, row your boat

This is why the internet wins. Read this post. I’ve never met Sean. I hope I do, someday. I’ll be singing the little song in my head, too, Sean. Many thanks.

Nobody cares

Nobody Cares Manifesto from Dennis Howlett via Hugh McLeod.

Lawyers, too.

On ROI–if you have to persuade your customer how much value you have conveyed to him/her, there is one inescapable conclusion.

Lazy lawyers write bad documents: “notwithstanding”

I am working on a trust document at this very moment.  It is sufficiently painful that I decided to stop somewhere on page 30-oblivion and blog about it.

Someone else wrote this trust document.  It is a template from a gigantic trust company and it is <bad words> horrible.  It is horrible because a lazy lawyer wrote it.  Someone who didn’t want to take the time to do it right.

The time he/she saved in writing will permanently cause the world to lose 100x that amount of time trying to figure out WTF the document means.  And no, I’m not going to fix it for them.

Evil incarnate:  “notwithstanding” is an evil word and finding it in a document is the sign of an inferior talent.

Let’s say you want to tell the reader “First you do this, then you do that, and when you’re finished do a third thing.”  DON’T then add a provision 12 pages later that says “Notwithstanding anything else you might find in this document, here is something that might overrule everything else I’ve written.”

Interpreted into English, that lawyer has just told you:  “This is really, really important, so watch out.  I’m not telling you where it might apply, I’m not telling you how it might work. kthxbai!  And good luck.”

Second translation:   “This is really important but I’m too lazy or stupid to figure out how to tell you about it, so you figure it all out.”  (Insert a lot of swear words from Phil right here).

Now I have to go through the entire document and think to myself, “Hmmm.  That thing the <blasphemy> lawyer stuck in the Second Schedule.  Does that apply to this clause?  What about this one?  What about this one?”   And once I find a potential candidate where that “Notwithstanding” trump card might apply, I have to figure out how it applies.  In other words I have to be a mindreader.

In addition to making the reader do the work that the author should have done, there is a deeper problem.  Writing a document like this makes for potential ambiguities and conflicts in interpreting the document.  On another trust document our office is working on right now, both we and the trustee (Gigantic TrustCo #2) agree that we have no <swearing> clue what a particular provision means.  And it is a “make or break” point.

Memo to all personnel:   if you’re writing a trust document (or any kind of document), it is the job of the author to understand the situation and tell the reader clearly and simply what’s going on.  Readers aren’t supposed to guess.

</rant>

Subprime mortgages explained, simply

Here is a simple explanation of subprime mortgages.  Classic.  Hat tip to Dennis Howlett at www.accmanpro.com.

Dining in Zurich: Ban Song Thai

Highly recommended: Ban Song Thai, Kirchgasse 6 in Zurich. I went there two years ago on a random whim. It was full but there are two barstools right by the cash register, so I sat there.

This trip I remembered it and returned. Stunning. Green curry with chicken, a spicy beef with Thai basil. Superb. Better than the late lamented T.U.S.K. that used to be in West Los Angeles. Dinner for two about CHF 85.

Reservations are strongly suggested. It is a small place. They have “the long table” which seats six. If you wander in without reservations and there is a space there, you are set. If the long table is full, there are the two barstools by the cash register. That’s it. I’ve been lucky.

Telephone (0)44 252 33 31.

Trip to Switzerland 21-25 January 2008

I’m headed to Switzerland for the week of 21 - 25 January 2008. I will be in Zurich and Geneva working on a couple of transactions and meeting up with lawyers and bankers I work with on these and other matters. It is astonishingly cheap to get from Los Angeles to Zurich. Yes, it is an internet age, etc. but there is no substitute for getting out of the office and going. It’s an amazing accelerant.

(); ?>